Photos and impressions from China
This has been a pretty big year for travelling to emerging markets...it's defintiely been the theme for me, anyway. India, Brazil, China...Brooklyn. Ok, kidding about Brooklyn.At the IBM event in China earlier this week I got a chance to hear
Thomas Friedman's "The World is Flat" pitch again. It's interesting to
hear him do it in front of a crowd of Chinese people as opposed to back
in the US. Either way, it's all about money, really. Who is going to
exploit whom? He says at one point, "It's either going to happen to
you, or you're going to do it to someone else." And by that he means being globalized.
You could read all this very cynically, of course, or choose to read it as something inevitable with a possibility for hope. Friedman outlines the three stages of globalization. First, he says, was Globalization 1.0, which was primarily prosecuted by nations. No big surprise there, nations were the only entities with the wherewithall to travel across the globe and haul stuff back (often taken at the tip of a sword, but still.) Then around the turn of the century came Globalization 2.0 -- that's the one we're so familiar with executed by corporations. Ok, again no big surprise -- you don't have to look much beyond the homepage of your favorite news source to see that in action every day. Hell, I live on the front lines of that battle.
But when he gets to Globalization 3.0 -- individuals -- my ears perk up a bit. Yeah, he asserts that the next phase in globalization will be carried out by individuals like you and me and Sanjeev and Raul and their peers in China, Eastern Europe and the rest of the developing world. With all this available bandwidth, anyone can hop on and compete for knowledge-based work from anywhere in the world. And with the advent of tools like Second Life (yes, I said tools, not games) virtual collaboration will get better and better until it ultimately obviates the need for most business travel. That's not next week, but sure it's not next century either.Why does this make me hopeful? Well, it seems like there's a decent opportunity for people to regain some control of their lives and self-organize in ways that are decent and fair rather than hierarchichal, arbitrary and capricious. Can you imagine a world populated by billions of freelancers? That would be a market that ruthlessly favored talent and responsibility, wouldn't it? I mean, you would hire people based on their skills and reliability over any other attribute, wouldn't you? In my humble opinion, that's the kind of world I want to live in. It feels more like a meritocracy than the one we live in now.
Not exactly vacation
When I was walking through the forbidden city I walked into a show-room with all the armour and weapons of the Qing dynasty. Fascinating...it was mostly swords and spears along with some rudimentary firearms. One of the placards read something along the lines of "at the end of the battle it became clear that the weapons of the invading Westerners were far superior to those of the emporer's armies."
How about that? How about facing armies of far less sophisticated people (because really, the culture of the invading Westerners was cro-magnon by comparison to the Chinese) and being outgunned and conquered? I guess that's the case all over the map. but in some ways now the West is getting its comeuppance. This flattening world is proving that the mind and spirit of the folks in the conquered regions are just as capable. And now they're about to take back some of the advantage that was robbed from them.If salaries in the West drop precipitously in equal measure to gains made in emerging markets i wouldn't be surprised at all. It's an inevitability. The West built up this luxurious life by extracting all that it needed by force. Let's just hope this equalization happens over a long enough period of time so that its not a shift characterized by wars and revolutions.
Freidman pointed out that if you asked him thirty years ago if he'd rather be a genius growing up in Bangalore or a B-student growing up in Brooklyn, the choice would be clear. The quality of life available to an average kid in the States far outstripped that of even the brightest kid in India. But now? The tables are turning...and fast.
PS. I bought a Chinese lute.


4 Comments:
You know, I'm not supposed to be cynical about this stuff, given that I am part of corporate America. But you know what? When I see a CEO "globalised" to Malaysia or India or China and paid 1/24th of what a US CEO would make -- in the name of responsibility to shareholders and "competition" -- THEN I will believe the whole "world is flat" rabble.
Until then, it's just rich forks gettng richer at the expense of the US middle class and on the backs of emerging markets' workers.
As far as the whole "billions of individuals acting in their own best interests," that argument neglects a major element of economics: capital. We can all play around in Second Life (and call me a Luddite, but to me it's just 3D&D, a bunch of geeks who need lives and can't relate to flesh and blood humans who are seeking refuge in a fake world where their avatars can be everything they cannot in the real world... I see the opportunities for companies like the one you mentioned to enable commerce on SL, and think those companies miss it at their peril, but that doesn't change the basic fact that those who can relate to the real world, do; those who cannot PLAY Second Life), and we can all act as freelancers free to act in our own best interests... but in the end, it is and has always been those who have the capital who are able to most effectively act in their own interests. It's still that way.
All these tools and all these voices speaking in their own voices and not for others is all fine and good. In the end, those with the money and power are not going to give it up. A market in which every actor is playing a free agent is a dangerous one for the System, not an empowering one; "ruthlessly favoring talent and responsibility" only works if those doing the hiring are the ones who benefit from it. If instead it is you and I who benefit and not The Globalised Enterprise (tm), that Enterprise has just lost its motive to hire us.
And you know what else scares me? All this putting profits over borders, all while paying lip service to the individual? It ignores national interest. It ignores culture, collective identity... it replaces the nation-state with the corporate-state. At this point, the profit motive of big companies has overtaken national interest motives of industrialized nations.
What matters isn't American jobs anymore (or French, or German, or Japanese, or even eventually Indian or Brazilian)... what matters is that private sector companies are making profits (again, on the backs of emerging market workers and at the expense of a nation's own middle class). That is a dangerous destabilization, to my mind. When we've determined that it's more important that the Fortune 500 are making money than it is for our own nation's workers to be supported and given a marketplace to work and excel in, we've shifted the balance of power from nation-states to corporations.
Does war follow? When there are no longer anymore emerging markets left to exploit, when the untapped people resources are exhausted... do these corporate interests now mimic the actions of nation-states for centuries -- assembling armies, engaging in acts of aggression, self-defense, and violence in order to either protect their own interests or seize the resources of another?
Is World War III going to be fought between Wal-Mart and Target? Between Microsoft and Google? Between Carrefour and Archer-Daniels-Midland?
Yeah, I'm running pretty far with this. But I don't think my basic premise is all that off... and I don't think it's really as healthy for the middle class and emerging market workforce as the oligarchy would have us believe.
My two cents.
Chron,
It's quite clear that corporations (namely defense contractors and oil companies) have been behind the two great U.S. military catastrophes of our time: Vietnam and Iraq. These were (and are) "perpetual" wars with no clear agenda, no plan for withdrawal, and little support from the people. Meanwhile, the richest 1% of Americans are fleecing the rest of us (and our children, and our grandchildren) through taxes and debt, and they're pocketing the cash that pays for the madness. Microsoft doesn't need an army of its own when it can so easily buy out Congress and the White House. Corporations need armies, yes, but they're not going to pay for them. They externalize those costs by keeping the tax burden (and the illusion of democratic civilian military control) on the peasants. For more information on how this system works, please visit the webpage I maintain: debtmonster.blogspot.com.
Your concerns about culture are well founded. Culture is created (and sustained) by people with time on their hands. We at MetaCritical.com believe that time is the most valuable of all commodities. Impoverished people do not have time to create (or sustain) culture, and nor do working people trapped in a system of wage slavery. The only culture “allowed” in America today is corporate culture, that is, culture created for profit by corporations. Ironically, I write this the day after Thanksgiving, the High Holy Day in the Church of the Corporation, when the vast majority of Americans will go to the malls to worship the god Mammon.
Wow..you guys are smurt. Some comments.
Globalization -- Free markets benefit the rich and ruthless. If America's only middle class is made up of thinkers, marketeers and biz development dickheads, we are in trouble. We need to continue to be doers.
Virtual Words -- I agree that stuff like 2nd life and stuff is interesting, but the idea that all this stuff gives us MORE time is silly. If anything, it give us less time to disconnect from the beast. A office-less, community-less (except on message boards, chats, ims) world is not better, imo.
Smurt.
your pal,
jeremy
Hi Ethan,
The thing about a zillion freelancers... I completely embraced the idea...
Last year I started my one man consulting/training business. My only presence online is my blog + some network profiles. I never advertise.
6 months later I was giving training at the university in Geneva to information managers from the WHO, CERN and other international organizations.
This year I'll probably go to China and India to train, give paid seminars and do business.
And as you know, this next to a full time at our dear employer...
It is possible, and it gives a great sense of fulfillment and independence, even if all the money I earn with this is immediately invested in the little farmhouse I am renovating.. ;-)
Post a Comment
<< Home